2/27/2005

Why do you need me? Why do you love me? Always and Forever.

Filed under: — goddessparkle @ 9:54 pm

So, I promised a few words on Napoleon Dynamite, and here they are.

I wonder if you have ever been on one of those amusement park rides where you sit in a harness (scroll down to where it says “Free Fall”) attached to the side of a tall tower, strapped in like an institutionalized madman, and are lifted one, two, perhaps three hundred feet into the air. When you reach the top of the tower there is a suspenseful pause where you gaze out over the field of Ferris-wheels and roller coasters like a queen surveying her kingdom, before gravity is allowed to do its thing and you are thrust like an egg to the ground, shooting downwards with thrilling speed.

The free fall is swift and over very quickly. The slow rising part of the ride, the part where you are being carried upward on the way to being flung down again, takes up most of the actual ride time. And to be sure this rising is enjoyable in itself. Your view of the park expands in ever widening circles, people diminish to toy-soldier scale, a mild and pleasurable vertigo bubbles in your belly as you mount. But of course the whole point of the journey, the reason for your rising in the first place, lives in those last few exhilarating and all too fleeting seconds when you are diving downwards like a bullet.

After all that, I have to confess that I have never been on one of these rides (although I would love to, because I find the experience of being flung about fast and furious like a rag doll in flight very enjoyable. I like feeling dizzy, light-headed, fleet. It’s why I like roller coasters, gyroscopes, swinging very high and fast, and spinning about on roller-chairs until I’m very nearly ill.)

I bring it up because watching Napoleon Dynamite is something akin to being on a free-fall ride like that. The eponymous movie follows a gangly, orange-fro’d anti-hero with an overbite, a penchant for outrageous self-aggrandizing lies, and a kind of dazzlingly self-centered eccentricity that is at once awkward, endearing, and irritating. Most of the actual time you spend watching the movie, collecting and savoring its small moments of intense weirdness, you are in that first half of the ride, inching ever higher up the side of the tower. Every time Napoleon licks his thick lips and blurts “GOSH,” or “YESSSSSS,” or “Flippin’ SWEET!”, every time he bats furiously at the tether-ball in the schoolyard, every entirely un-ironic unicorn that appears on a t-shirt or notebook cover, that’s you ascending another few feet up into the air, in preparation for the eventual plummet.

Napoleon Dynamite is breathtakingly random and weird (so determinedly quirky, in fact, that I was a bit taken aback to find, from time to time, my mouth literally hanging open in pleasantly stunned disbelief). It contains – to name the least of its oddities – a pet llama, a time machine, and a contest in which Napoleon and his best friend Pedro win medals for their expert knowledge of cows.

But there really isn’t much of a plot holding the film together, because despite appearances, it’s not actually about the triumph of dorkdom over coolness. Yeah, Napoleon gets beat up and teased, but under Jared Hess’s direction Jon Heder plays his character as oblivious – or perhaps impervious – to the emotional damage you’d think he would experience. The film is actually quite tiring to watch sometimes because the acting is achingly deadpan (perhaps to counterbalance the strangeness of the dialogue and events in the film, everyone’s delivery is understated to the point of being poker-faced).

And then, about 80 minutes into the movie, there is a transcendent sequence lasting perhaps three minutes which by itself justifies and illuminates the entire rest of the film. It makes everything leading up to that moment worthwhile, the way the drop validates the ascent in the amusement park ride. When you get there, your strange and sometimes exhausting journey is rewarded, because you now have the immense and hilarious pleasure of watching Napoleon doing something (I won’t tell you what) that somehow manages to be supremely dorky and completely fabulous at the same time – and you are in free fall. Or at least, I was.

This wasn’t a profound film, or a particularly compassionate one — but man, those three minutes were fun.

P.S. If you see this, you should know that there is an epilogue after the credits that is “flippin’ SWEET!”

8 Responses to “Why do you need me? Why do you love me? Always and Forever.”

  1. Sarah Says:

    Omigosh - where is Susan? She can quote scads of lines from this movie. I, for one, can no longer cook up a pan of tater tots without thinking about Napoleon….

    Randy: Napoleon, give me some of your tots.
    Napoleon Dynamite: No, go find your own.
    Randy: Come on, give me some of your tots.
    Napoleon Dynamite: No, I’m freakin’ starving! I didn’t get to eat anything today.
    Randy: [kicks the tots]
    Napoleon Dynamite: Ugh! Gross! Freakin’ idiot!

    Another great part, that you MUST hear Susan do:

    Deb: What are you drawing?
    Napoleon Dynamite: A liger.
    Deb: What’s a liger?
    Napoleon Dynamite: It’s pretty much my favorite animal. It’s like a lion and a tiger mixed… bred for its skills in magic.

    I’m a dork, I know.
    I loved those swing rides - is that the type you mean, M? I was always afraid the chain would break and I’d fly off and crash into the food booths. Ahh, danger.

  2. Sarah Says:

    I meant to say that the swing ride I was talking about was different from the “pirate ship” ones Meera referenced, not that she didn’t know what she meant.

    Sorry.

  3. Meera Says:

    Sorry, I didn’t mean the pirate ship rides (even though they appear first on the page I linked to). I mean the ones that are further down on the page. Entry edited for clarity.

    The pirate ship ones were cool, though. And the fear is part of the pleasure. Roller coasters tend to make me laugh out loud.

  4. jobiv Says:

    I would LOVE to trade lines with Sus… finally, she’ll say, “What movie, what movie,” and I’ll know the damn answer.

    I was thinking about how Napolean Dynamite fits in the same weird category as Better Off Dead - in which no one, and everyone, is cool. The movie is great because it lets you look around in these people’s bizarrely realistic lives, note the wood-panelling, the mundane routines of school, home and work, interrupted by the inevitable bursts of imaginative and self-aggrandizement. It’s fascinating and ridiculous.

    And Meera, I like your metaphor, and I agree. It’s all worth it.

  5. Erica Says:

    So I had trouble deciding (based on clothing and references to the internet): did this movie take place in the early 80’s. or in a present day Nebraska time warp?

  6. Sus Says:

    Okay, sorry to be so absent. Lots to say, lots to say.
    1) JoBiv, now I will only be quoting two movies (Reality Bites and Napoleon), so it should be fairly easy for you.
    2) I saw LIVE footage of a REAL LIVE liger on CNN the other day! No, really, it was a liger! My sister said, “Wait, that’s a liger? It looks like a… well, like a… actually, it looks exactly like a cross between a lion and a tiger!” And indeed it was. Although I’m not sure if it was bred for its skills in magic.
    3) The movie is so stupid that it’s brilliant. Those who are not fans probably went in with too much expectation. Although even Kristin, who claims to hate it, was giggling at Sarah and me trading off lines.
    4) It has to be modern day, but why did I think they were in Idaho??
    5) One of my favorite parts (really, there are too many to say just one) is when LaFawnduh goes, “Why are you all sweaty?” and Napoleon says, “I was practicing,” and LaF goes, “What were you practicing?” and N says, “Dance moves.” And then he takes the biggest chug of his red Gatorade and it dribbles all over his shirt. Seriously, folks. BRILLIANT.
    6) Did anyone see the clip of him doing the Top 10 on Letterman? Another stroke of brilliance.

  7. Meera Says:

    “4) It has to be modern day, but why did I think they were in Idaho??”

    ‘Cause the principal says so when he’s chiding Pedro for his Summer pinata…

  8. jobiv Says:

    I do believe they’re in an Idaho time warp, however, so the timelessness applies here, too. And I also wonder if it the costumes for the dance weren’t a rude little homage to such great films as “She’s Out of Control” and “Footloose.” God, I hope so.

    And how ’bout the first time you see LaFawnduh’s name in print? Oh my god I almost peed myself.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress