On knowing and understanding
Tonight I’m writing about 20th century genius John Von Neumann, trying to clearly and simply explain the wonders of game theory and computer architecture and the exceedingly strange little beasties known as cellular automata. I’m succeeding only somewhat in my mission, and it’s making me think about all those times I was a kid (really so much a kid, even when I was in college) trying to read papers on topics that were beyond my ken and not really even knowing why they were beyond my ken, only that they were confusing for reasons that I couldn’t articulate. I would read, become mildly baffled or entirely perplexed, and feel as a result either frustration, resignation, or perhaps a touch of the sublime. In any case I would never have been able to see why I didn’t see. If you see.
I’m not all that much smarter or more knowledgable now (a little, to be sure) but now when I am confused I do tend to more pointedly zero in on ideas that I don’t understand, figure out what — broadly — I am missing, in terms of fundamental principles or background information, and either
a) Figure things out to my own satisfaction (should I say self-satisfaction?), or
b) Snort huffily at the writer of the book or article in disgust because they haven’t given me enough to go on, not at all no sirree how dare they.
You’ve no idea how much confidence and clarity it’s given me to become so aware of the boundaries of my knowledge and understanding (and sometimes even my intelligence) and to have the tools to push, slowly, at them or to be able to recognize when I’ve leapt unwittingly beyond their safe grounds and am falling, like Wile. E. Coyote, into thin air. I only hope the poor kids reading these little biographies have an inkling of the same self-awareness, so that I don’t frustrate them when I don’t have the space or wherewithal to explain something properly.
One reference I read called Von Neumann a polymath. I should like to be a polymath someday, but I think you have to be a bit of a genius to really deserve the term. I can be an amateur polymath though. I’ll play in the Polymath Little Leagues.
(Today’s photograph tattoos the magnolia tree in our backyard onto Laura’s skin. Laura never even saw the magnolia tree in our backyard, I don’t think. And now it covers her shoulders forever.)
P.S. Ethan, I know there are a million artifacts in my pictures, particularly when I’ve worked on them a bit. I really don’t care, but I hope they don’t offend your eyes.







